In the past, product manufacturers would implement forums relevant to their product and people who owned that product could share knowledge. These forums were referred to as “communities” and they were specific to the product that they were dedicated to.
To join the forum under the gears of war namespace then you at least need a microslop account.
You could call Twitter a community too but it’s a global community that is in no way owned or controlled by TC or even Microsoft. There surely are twitter users in the global community that are also part of the subset of that community which is the gears of war one but that is not necessary.
Can TC limit twitter users to ones that actually play gears of war or can Play Station troll boys on Twitter pull forces and vote us in the crappiest choices possible?
They do ban toxic forum members from here but they can’t ban trolls from twitter and those guys could go nuts applying votes that subvert your and my choices.
I seriously do not know why TC doesn’t have a most robust web presence that it wrote. Software companies should know how to make a web site and define and regulate useful input from verified users. To that end… in game is honestly a much more secure venue than anywhere else. I get the impression that they’re too lazy or greedy to write web code and I’d like them to feel teased that going lazy and giving the whole world access to OUR choices. It should be embarrassing. If they can write a game then they can write an aspx. I don’t want them to be embarrased because I’m mean or full of hate either - I’d like them to use that embarrasment to feel motivated to showcase their coding skills and design prowess as opposed to submitting to Twitters instead.
