aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I understand what you are saying, but if you strictly based the leaderboards on Wins/Losses you would end up with a lot of people towards the top that dont belong there, and a lot of people at the bottom that dont belong there. So if i get 80 kills and i am MVP every match but matchmaking puts me with 4 bronze that get 4 kills a match and i lose. I should remain a bronze?
Then you never get the opportunity to see how you perform on a good team equally as skilled as you.
aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Yeah but ping and internet speed dont matter on the Lakers. This is a video game over the internet. Gears has a competitive scene where only wins and losses matter. You can even find leagues throughout the web where people play based on wins and losses. Noone in Gears online is going to say im Diamond 5 look at this bronze lets pick him
Up for our random squad.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
But my one point is you said you didnt like Gears 4 ranking system. Yet that system has in place you have to win to go up. And in Gears 5 you still get more points for a win than a loss.
If you are winning and equal skill in Gears 5 you will still be higher rank than someone losing every match.
what you keep bringing up is a rank for teams that remain the same in almost every game. Something that would work with Esports teams but not the everyday Gears player
2 Likes
Preach!
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa