Sure, but his character doesn’t exactly get a lot of development throughout the games, especially not in Gears 1, and you have to read the books(or dig through the wiki, or read posts of the more knowledgeable lore nerds on this forum) to get a better understanding of his character because Epic intended him as “fully developed” when introduced in Gears 1. Something that Traviss managed to squeeze a few things out of in Gears 3 though.
And I stand by my point that I do not see how or why Kait needs to be “improved” or “fixed” to be a ‘shining beacon of feminism’(
) when that does not seem to be the point of her character… and she’s perfectly fine within the universe as it currently exists. You know, unless you want to push certain types of agendas or politics in a video game where they don’t have much business unless it’s subtle digs at certain things that don’t take away from the experience(which trying to be “progressive” with female characters isn’t in a few games where they’re just unrealistic and actually annoying - whatever people say though, Kait isn’t an “agenda pushing” character and has never been, nor is she a person like Sam who enjoys taking shots at a certain once blonde haired and now bald person all the time) or if they fit within context. What I see being suggested in the OP… I don’t really see the point of it within Gears, for Kait’s character
(Minor edit-in : the reason why I think Gears female characters are all perfectly fine as they are is because they are just, well… that. Characters, people, not some over the top representation of any gender that is just ridiculous and obvious agenda pushing like in other games.)
Right, I’ll stop now cause my thoughts are still a bit disorganized after a night of unrestful sleep and my post risks to be too messy(more than it already is anyway) if I continue. Damn heat keeping me awake(probably shouldn’t have played the RE2 remaster to its end until about an hour before I went to sleep either).