It was bad at first and got a little better. People were losing thousands of points with MVP and on wins. Theres a reason Ryan and Dana made a podcast of the ranking system trying to explain it.
I’m talking about the new gp system. Before update.
But yeah that one was silly too. It did get better at the end, then scrapped.
I thought this was talking about the old system
1 Like
Nah, they kept complaining about the new gp.
Like y’all are pro’s. Anyone should be easy against them… especially a stacked pro team…
1 Like
Gotcha.
This new system has its good and bad, but the bad far outway the good.
2 Likes
Even on here there were a people complaining about lesser rank people earning to much GP. Which I believe comes down to the best player not getting the recognition they deserve. All TC had to do was go by score and award GP. Instead the made it more difficult and more of a grind by lowering the Gp to 1 and not being able to offset anything with performance in a losing effort. Even if you win 2-0 it isn’t worth dominating because of entry cost.
1 Like
100% agree. I find it hysterical that someone with 80 elims, 10 caps and 1 break will be the MVP over someone with 100 elims, 10 caps just because that person got 1 break
n the higher tiers you are better off going 2-1 this way you can cap your GP. The entry cost are too high to actually dominate
3 Likes
Yup. Totally agree.
Wish they worked it out by score.
The social mode is rewarding to see but wish it was implemented in ranked.
Like gears 4…
Well we are gonna see what TC has in store for us come Tuesday. Hopefully this TU go smooth.
Honestly I dont care at this point because the system ALWAYS screws me over lol
1 Like
Yup, I think that’s the better way to do things. The win in my opinion is by far the most important thing. In lots of other games you will go down in rank if you lose so why is gears any different. It’s fine
Thats just stupid. You end up with people in higher ranks that shouldnt be there. Yes winning is important but it shouldnt be the top factor for an individual rank
Lets say in TDM if you get 1 elim and die 19 times, even though your team won you should get rewarded for that???
Just because other games are doing it doesnt mean Gears has to.
2 Likes
Guess lot’s of other games are just being stupid and doing the wrong thing. Go tell them that, it won’t change a thing. That’s just how it works, you gotta accept it. Lots of games are like that, just try and improve and if you lose you lose.
NO YOU DONT
Im not saying other games are stupid for doing that, Im saying Gears isnt like other games. Its an individual rank not a team rank. Winning shouldnt be the #1 factor.
Also you didnt answer my question
If in TDM you get 1 emlination and die 19 times you should be rewarded just because you won?
How about if the guy on the losing team gets double the elims as the highest person on the winning team they should lose rank?
Yup if you win you should go up, how much though, that’s not for me to decide but you should go up if your on the wining team, probably less if your performance is low. Like what league of Legends does I think that’s good. you go up or down in rank based on the win or loss.
Just like someone who lost but has the best performance shouldnt lose rank
I completely disagree with you.
2 Likes
I found that there where less players when they removed TDM.
Noticeably there adding TDM in again. I’ll be back playing when it’s there.
2 Likes
Absolutely not.
If I go 19-1 and lose I shouldn’t go down but I would. But a player that goes 1-19 deserves to gain?
Hell no.
4 Likes
Well I’m sorry to tell you dude but lot’s of games are like that. It’s just how it is
The win matters most. Lot’s of games are like this. It’s just how it is.