Worst i’ve had is a drop to 100%. No actual de-rank to a lower tier.
Do you mean it’s worse than gears 4? Because I lost many games in D4 and never went down % at all.
Solo will be very tough if placement is based on leaderboards for that reason - there is only so much you can do as 1 man on your team.
ah ok, thank you
so it does lock you at your highest rank
keep grinding until a fix/update
Well, it could drop you tiers… i just haven’t experienced it. I’ve lost a match and gone to 100% but I didn’t lose the next one.
Quitters are still a gdamn plague though.
if you don’t get a quitter
you get a walker or a chainsawer
past couple of days, i don’t think i have played a fair game
then if you play with a team…it doesn’t find a match
dammed if you do, dammed if you dont
@GhostofDelta2 can you combine these threads? Otherwise i’ll need a refund on my forum fees.
If the enemy team quits out, you get rewarded with lost points/percentages.
That’s a high incentive to continue playing the match?
Among other oddities, this is another nuisance.
@TC_Octus - TC really needs to explain how ranked is supposed to work…
https://forums.gearsofwar.com/t/mvp-in-unfavored-match-win-de-rank/28739
Done.
I honestly think there is something wrong with the way they calculate whom is favored. I think total score doesn’t matter or eliminations. It might just be a K/D thing. I been on some really bad random teams and lost 2-0 only to see that we were heavily favored to win. A couple of those matches I was shocked to see I gained tier points. Keep bringing it up on Twitter I don’t think they pay much attention to there own forums. At least I seen Octus reply to some about this issue, even though it was a text book reply.
Yep yep,
And maybe there isn’t anything wrong but it just isn’t transparent enough to understand. I’ll keep posting personal findings here and keep messaging on twitter. They used to be responsive on Twitter.
I rank up even when I lose on gears 5 now?
Sure seems that way
I’ve had that happen with me in silver and gold tiers. Not in onyx tho
that’s a huge problem right there.
last night, well this morning, i played against a guy about 4-5 games in a span of 6-7 games.
When he wasn’t going to win, he bailed on his team. When he had a chance, because I had anchors weighing me down on my team, he stayed and won.
Him quitting means he is avoiding penalties, right? BUT he is penalizing us because when he quits are skill pts get screwed.
This is not right, it should be balanced to when they quit during the game.
I’m curious what happens to you when you quit. I’ll have to hop on a smurf account and try it… But at the same time that’s not fair to whoever gets stuck with my smurf on their team.
Yeah no this game’s ranking system is completely messed lmao.
MVP again, went 12-4 and won the game, lost 173 points (at silver 2). So real
This was precisely my experience with Gears 4 as well. It almost seemed like it was possible to build up a “cushion” on Gears 4 because even on the off chance I performed just kinda so-so I still wouldn’t lose % from that one bad game.
Compared to Gears 5, you’re basically not allowed to have a “bad game” (or even sometimes just a sorta good game) or you’re going down in rating almost guaranteed.
Coming from somebody with the Diamond Gear and a Diamond 5 banner in Gears 4, Gears 5’s ranking system feels so bad and punishing by comparison. Hopefully it gets better.
Sheesh, at silver 2?
Well that throws out my ‘higher ranks are punishing’ theory.
We’re all just spinning wheels now until TC breaks silence on how they’re calculating.
you have to be efficient to rank up.
don’t look at the elims because i mean you can get 100 elims by focusing on that and shoothing everyone with just a bullet or two. elims are not a stat to go by.
kd? no, it isn’t about camping either.
you have to be efficient. like think about running around the map in cod hardpoint, getting kills, clearing the hill and dropping streaks - that is how you rank up.
it has to be tweaked but i hope they dont make it like gears 4 were undeserving people made it to diamond rank, high diamond rank
it should be tough and playing on a full team and winning easy and boring games shouldn’t rank you up.
the top soccer team in the league doesn’t necessarily have to have the best 11 players of the season.
i think we can ask for one thing but careful not to ruin another
players like us, who are actually good at the game, need to be rewarded.
just like there are actual good players in teams that are not champions of their league.
That’s a fair point about “it should be hard”. Too often you’d run across Diamonds who were absolute doodoo butter without their stack in Gears 4, I wonder if it’ll be that way again this time when everything settles.
I think what Alice and I (and a lot of the rest of us) are saying is that the system as it currently stands doesn’t seem to always make a lot of sense. Compared to Gears 4 which (for me anyways) pretty much always made sense. I never felt like I was being robbed unfairly when I didn’t move up % and definitely never ranked down from a match I know I popped off in.
You pretty much have to demand perfection of yourself to rank up, which i personally like but it does seem that some times you play a long game and do good but get negative or zero pts.
I managed to get to masters rank in koth quite quickly but i do think it is harsh.
I just don’t want “doodoo butter” players to get to where they don’t deserve. That is my concern.
You should have to be an oustanding player to make diamond and masters.
Not just someone who plays a lot or who hides behind a stacked team.
in my view, masters rank is like the NFL all-pro team.
Do you happen to know off hand how quickly you got to Masters in KotH? Like in how many games, I mean.
That’s the mode I’m grinding right now myself, so I’m curious.
i can’t say exactly but it can’t be too many… After getting out of silver 2 i went up at least 50 percent in tier rank every day after that.