I am sooooo tired of misleading Horde card descriptions

how about the translations on medala and daily tod stuff?
You guys can’t be this incompetent all the time and expect no one to notice. Hell, I don’t even play in other languages and thank christ for that, I’d never know what was expected to finish the medals

wtf is a boom shield??? Or a cleaver??? Are you even playing gears 5 or are you reminiscing about the shield in GOW2, and the cleaver from then as well???

1 Like

Those were the only heavy weapons you could run with, easy as that.

I answered someone’s question.

2 Likes

I think the special characters are in a weird place, They don’t have a lot of cards, Or cards that combo well with their own kits, Most of the fans feel they don’t belong in the Gears game, I didn’t mind the halo characters, it made sense to me as halo and gears are xbox’s biggest exclusives. Which microsoft has been really striding for more games this generation around. The Terminator series though? why? I sorta feel like someone from the movie business pitched to TC about it so they could get more people to go see the new movie but did TC realize that movies have one single high point and then just disappear ?

specially if they don’t do well at the box office…

I guess I could understand if some devs grew up watching those movies and were psyched about making characters for their game…

but I do feel that these special characters and even Jack need some tuning.

The hero system is also slowing TC down at the same time.

You’re giving an answer that has ZERO merit, who gives a fk if you could run with a heavy item in a game from a dozen years ago

Well, the guy was using the card wrong because there’s no Boom shield or Cleaver in Gears 5.

There is however that swarm spike hammer @MikelTheLastOne, that might work with the stun perk as it’s a heavy weapon.

Well I imagine actually, it’s because They were working on Gears Tactics, and pretty sure they have been working on Gears 6 for the new xbox 5 so…

also I understand the frustration that some gears fans have with the character system/class systems that they have been trying to fine tune since gears judgement.

I like the character individuality, but I’m starting to think that maybe they should just make a different mode for classic horde fans…

personally I’d love to play as the locust again in reverse horde but thats just me.

There is a tri-shot on the card it self.

8 Likes

I gave up Horde after I hit re-up XX. It’s the exact same meta for Master Horde. EVERY. ■■■■■■■. TIME. As for Multiplayer, FFA brought me back to it. And so true with Cole, for the longest time I thought the Haymaker card was working for Torch Tackle until I tested with and without Haymaker. It doesn’t ■■■■■■■ count.

1 Like

to be fair; Gears itself never was pretty clear about what classifies as a heavy weapon and not. I remember one of the later achievement-batches had one related to heavy weapons and the bow and dropshot also counted towards that.

1 Like

Specifically regarding Sarah Connor:

Either the card text and image needs to change so that it only shows and references buzzkill and salvo, or they need to fix the code to allow all heavy weapons to have extra ammo. Let’s hope it’s the latter, for obvious reasons.

However if you only have her to level 9, you have no business being anywhere near even an Insane horde match, never mind inconceivable or master. You won’t have her useful cards maxed by level 9. In fact you would have only just unlocked the vital Heavy Preparations card at that point. Max her and her cards out before judging her too quickly. A level 3 or 4 weapon locker full of salvos, each of which will have 40 rounds in it, is plenty. I’ve never run out. Especially in those higher difficulties, there’s a good chance your engineer is running an overclock card on your locker to refill even quicker. And/or you can get jack to put frags on a locker to keep them regenerating. She’s nowhere near as bad as people like to make out. And because she only has 8 cards, you can max them all out before most of the other characters.

2 Likes

Terminator came out almost 30 years ago and it’s still relevant today.

I don’t think that is having a high point and just disappearing.

And honestly, Halo doesn’t fit any better into this game world than Terminator does yet they both fit at the same time. I wish they would flesh them out to be full characters though and I like the addition of them as it gives us more options.

1 Like

If they pay any further attention to feature characters I’d prefer they did so when they don’t have their hands full with the current situation for PvE.

1 Like

no really an excuse when SplashDamage was the lead developer on Tactics

2 Likes

Sweet, even if you mention on the card what it doesn’t affect(although there should be a logical reason).

so TC just took credit for it? their name comes up when I boot up the game.

I’m talking about the box office, for movies to really make profit, They have to do well at the box office opening day, why this is I’m not sure. Specifically, Terminator took 185 million dollars to make, but only made 29 millions in ticket sales, This means the movie flopped, as it did not make enough money for the amount it took to make it, IF the movie flops, it usually falls to the wayside and people try to forget about it.

unlike games, movies can’t go into the film and make an update on the fly to please consumers.

so by this I mean, there is usually a period of hype for a movie before it is shown in theaters, then its released and thats the high point…if it does well, that high point keeps going, if it flops it disappears into memory… you know what I’m saying?

That’s only American sales that are counted. Many movies that are considered a flop here make enough globally to at least break even.

For instance, the Kevin Costner movie Waterworld was considered one of the biggest flops ever but……. With a budget of $172 million (and a total outlay of $235 million once marketing and distribution costs are factored in), the film grossed $88 million at the North American box office. The film did better overseas, with $176 million at the foreign box office, for a worldwide total of $264 million .

1 Like

Oh would you just pipe down you degenerate and stop spamming?

1 Like