Arms Race was awful imo, I’m still waiting for ranked Guardian to come back.
2 Likes
Nothing like getting drunk playing arms race haha…
1 Like
I would need to be drunk to play that lol.
5 Likes
They should add a game mode with that holds more teams of 4, with additional cog/swarm-locust equipment, etc to use. Example Locust would have a beast rider, a larger Kantus with more health/special ability’s? Why couldn’t there be more added to PvP gameplay to make it more interesting? silverback? able to actually use a warden with the two hammer weapons? Come on, the game has potential, make the movement more dark and give each character a special ability based on their history through the lore? where there’s more shadows and dark spaces making the character stealthy?
1 Like
The Hivemind hates Judgment, which pretty much evolved around this premise with Overrun. Thank all these people who got filtered back then.
If they left the controls alone, Judgement would have been WAY better. That is the only thing I didn’t like about it which I am guessing is the main reason people didn’t like it.
Stupid reason imo. I always enjoy the dedicated nade-button when going back to play through the campaign. And back when it released I wasted countless hours playing Overrun. Such a great mode, almost on par with Escape.
It took some getting used to but yes, Overrun was a lot of fun. The dedicated grenade button was interesting but I found myself accidentally throwing it when trying to pull the Tac Com up. But when I got used to it, it was mostly fine. But going back to it is tricky since it is so different compared to what I am used to.
1 Like
I kinda understand that, but after playing so many games I personally can adapt pretty quickly to new control-schemes.
I still will never understand the hate Judgment got and still gets. Like I said, Overrun was a blast, much better than Horde in 3, PvP was a lot of fun and had a lot of great maps. And the campaign is probably the best in the franchise since PCF made it very arcade-y, making replaying it a lot of fun.
2 Likes
UK here pretty much very low ping most of the time but theres problems deeper than that that makes it feel laggy…netcode.
In regards to g4 I think they shut down alot of the servers and your connected to something far far away just like most of gears player hopes
Hear hear
Guardian would be a great addition to ranked and the player base seems to be there, I can always find a game no probs.
2 Likes
Second that, it’s a good team based mode
Ticks the single life mode box too at times.
Always interesting and heart racing when both leaders are dead and you know you ain’t gonna respawn
1 Like
I agree. Guardian would be a great game mode for ranked!
2 Likes
you dont cry about modes being gone before they are gone… thats just nonsensical
1 Like
yeah everyone switches in to execution mode…the running stops and now you holding down the power weapon spawn point, or getting ready for a Gnasher battle 1v1…remember them!?
i like and think dodgeball was a great mode its got everything, if you agree,
it can come down to 1v4 but one good landed gnasher shot can turn the whole game around before you know it its 4v1 or even your whole team get no respawns at all…you just don’t know. i would like to think its best played with execution rules and not warzone as lancers will be less of a thing in more open maps.
what do you think?
1 Like
Exactly, you play them while you still have the chance. Which clearly isn’t the case with Execution or Gridiron.
Nobody played those modes, you complain and you don’t know what you want, and that they leave the game is a joke, because afterwards they are the first to play it because they will always complain.
And as far as maps are concerned, there is already an acceptable number, if people vote for the same maps it is a community problem.
about 4v4 is truth but there are people who prefer it
I know exactly what I want. I want more options than two team based game modes for ranked. I never had a problem finding gridiron or execution matches when those were available in ranked.
The map voting is definitely a community problem. There are many maps available at this point but all people vote for is bloodrive and checkout (both very good maps). Occasionally I will get a different map. I’ve played one match on river out of about 30 games.
So we have two game modes and a handful of maps that are actually voted for. Does that sound fun? This game has so much potential but continues to disappoint.
3 Likes
I did not say that just for you, but they were ways that so many people played them, although honestly I would have left them anyway, instead currently in ranked there are 4 modes, and in social you can play guardian, the other modes in social voting or in personalized ones, but as I said, if it were me, TC would have left them, if it is difficult for people to find a game or there are no people, it is no longer their problem.
As for the maps, what TC should do is remove those from the vote and only put the new or less used ones, but I insist that this is a community problem and no matter how much you tell TC, it can do little, because even if it puts others equally people would eventually do the same
I forgot to say that the only mode in which people were playing and I still don’t understand why they removed it is guardian, and more so now with the new mechanics that makes it better, the problem with Tc is that things that I could fix in a week or in a short time they spend more than their due time doing it, not to mention that they do things that the community does not ask for like 4v4 sometimes, but I honestly think that apart from the community it is toxic, many people criticize the game sometimes too nonsense, especially when they make good decisions(I’m not saying it because of your topic)