Gameplay Update - Lancer and Gnasher Tuning

APR 16, 2020


Versus logo

With the release of Operation 3, we introduced new movement and weapon tuning as part of the Gameplay and Combat Roadmap.

While some of the changes were well received, we’ve also heard the feedback around updated tuning of the Gnasher and Lancer. As such, we’re rolling out immediate and incremental changes to accomplish the following:

  • Reduce the power of the Lancer: Increase Accuracy bloom (reduced accuracy per-shot) to 28% to match the classic Lancer (Gears 3 and 4). Note: It takes 0.84 seconds to reach maximum inaccuracy with sustained fire under normal circumstance (active reload increases the rate of fire).
  • Improve the ‘feel’ of the Gnasher: Bullet magnetism range reverted to TU4.2 at 8m of effectiveness (was 6m).
  • Addressing Gnasher gib range: Temporarily disabled the new gib-range calculation system due to a newly discovered bug, which should bring the gib range down to intended levels.

These changes will be live from ~`11am PT today. See below for a detailed description of the changes.


Traditionally, the Lancer was a large-clipped, decently-damaging support weapon that was used to punish people caught out in the open and, if you landed most of your shots consistently, with the ability to finish off the down in the same clip. This was balanced by the fact the Lancer had an ‘area’ of accuracy, known as accuracy bloom, that ensured not every shot in the clip was actually hitting at mid-long range with sustained fire.

In Gears 5, we adopted a recoil-based model for almost all weapons which changed the dynamics of the Lancer resulting in a much more accurate Lancer (irrespective of aim assist). As a result of this increased accuracy, we reduced the magazine size from prior games. The downside of this reduction was that players are no longer cleaning up their downs as consistently.

In Operation 3, we increased the size of the Lancer clip to address an issue. However, the combination of the removal of Flashbangs (in loadouts) and the new global loadout active reload timing – this change unfortunately spiked the Lancer’s potency more than we expected.

This is part of our intention is to evolve the Lancer from the assault-rifle level capabilities introduced in Gears 5 back to the more traditional Lancer-as-a-support-weapon capabilities.

The end result should be a Lancer that’s slightly less potent, easier to fight against and more consistent to use for all types of players. Better players will still be able to eek out a slightly higher DPS by feathering the trigger and aiming for the head – just like in past Gears games.

We’ll be closely monitoring the impact of these changes and your feedback to determine if more steps need to be taken to achieve this goal.


Accuracy bloom (reduced accuracy per-shot) increased 28% to match classic Lancer (Gears 3 and 4).
Note: It takes 0.84 seconds to reach maximum inaccuracy with sustained fire


The Gnasher changes introduced in Operation 3 improved Gnasher ranged calculation consistency, but two changes had unintended consequences that require addressing.

In terms of feel, the reduction in the Gnasher’s hipfire magnetism range is making the weapon feel inconsistent to the previous version. We know this is something the community wanted us to try, but based on the feedback, reducing the magnetism hurts the feel of the Gnasher too much for us to keep. As a result, we are reverting the magnetism back to its pre-Op 3 range of 8m.

With regards to the gib range, prior to Operation 3, we reduced the gib range from 250 unreal units (uus) to 230 unreal units – the intended current gib range in Gears 5.

In Operation 3, we added a new calculation method that determines gib range based on the same origin point on the model, rather than the closest pellet impact point. This has been a problem in Gears since its inception, and the end result were those frustrating moments where it appeared someone was in range and didn’t gib, or appeared to get gibbed at a distance they shouldn’t have.

Our new system calculates all pellet hits on an enemy against the same origin point on the model, creating a much more consistent range calculation and removing a lot of these experiences. When comparing the two methods, the new calculation averaged to 20uu ahead, making the gib range feel further away. So we upped the gib range to 250 uus in order to make it feel like 230 uus (ie. parity with pre-Op 3 gib range).

Unfortunately, there’s a bug in the system that didn’t become apparent until the game was being played at scale.

Essentially, the system right now is calculating that range with some time accounted for latency – 2 frames to be exact – based on server predictions using your momentum at the time of the shot. This means that, if you are hit while inputting any movement towards the player, you can step into gib range based on this prediction without actually having stepped into gib range. This is extending the potential gib range of the Gnasher and making it feel like a major increase when it’s not.

Until we can resolve this bug in a Title Update, we are disabling the feature to restore the traditional method of calculations rather than waiting for a full fix. This should bring the feeling of the gib range closer to its intended range in the interim.


  • Bullet magnetism range reverted to TU4.2 state at 8m of effectiveness (6m → 8m).
  • Temporarily disabled the new gib-range calculation system due to a newly discovered bug, which should bring the gib range down to intended levels.

We want to emphasize is that, with any tuning update we make, there’s always a chance we don’t land something correctly – especially with the reality of more limited testing capabilities due to COVID-19.

As a team, we’re listening, reacting and delivering on our intentions. If something doesn’t feel right, let us know why. Tuning is an open conversation for us, one that we don’t shy away from nor intend to pull any sleights of hand with, and one we’ll continue beyond today as we have before. We believe these changes will be a step forward, but if more changes are needed, we’ll make them.

If you’re interested in learning or asking more about weapon tuning, don’t miss our Gears Developer Stream tomorrow at 3pm PT as we talk to Jamie Mactaggart (Lead Gameplay Designer for Gears 5) about these changes and a lot more.

Let us know what you think on our Forums, tweeting us @GearsofWar or posting on /r/GearsofWar.


See you in a couple of weeks when all this gets changed again boys.


Ohhh you!!!

1 Like

I’m so naughty.

1 Like

Wonder if Jamie did the write up?

Probably one of the more detailed yet understandable tuning updates I’ve ever read from TC.

Maybe this is a good sign for the future.


Okay I get that Gears 5 is SaaS and that constant updates are a thing but…is it because they’re Canadian that they give so much detail? This is unnecessary imo. Make your changes TC but don’t feel obligated to detail it out like this. It will only make the forum dwellers more irate.

1 Like

Extremely glad to see this. All we need now is the movement reverted because currently it’s a bit slow with the bounces. But I’ll take what I can for now.


OP2 tuning was the paramount of Gears 5 to me, the look and feel of gnasher and movement was something in between Gears 4 and Gears 5 signature.

Revert back the movement to OP2, and you’ve got a happy fan.


Have they said anything about a console fov slider?

we should add rocket shoes so that we can fly around the map

1 Like


1 Like

OP2 wasn’t even that fast. But there is no reason to slow your movement down to the likes of walking in mud.


Yesterday I noticed that the Lancer took almost more rounds to kill someone who was downed than it did to down them ). Hopefully that’s done. Does this mean the lancer isn’t as good as it was in Horde?

Good decision TC

nothing slow about the movement now or before there is a difference between the game being slow and it making sense.


So yeah, TC pretty much confirmed there was some key changes made since Operation 2. Good to know they’ve been basically reverted.

But no mention on movement. I guess this is…good? Hopefully this means they’re sticking with what’s there now and don’t plan to change it again anytime soon.

1 Like

If you like it that’s great. Many don’t like the new movement. Many do like it. Can’t please everyone. What they choose is whatever but I’m giving my preference.


I don’t think overall movement was slowed down. I believe TC_Octus already confirmed this. What I think people are experiencing is the adjusted speed boost values. You’re no longer getting constant speed boosts off every wall bounce or cover, so it feels like its slower when it really isn’t.


I need to invoice TC for my time testing all these tunings and changes.