Hey, I love pahanu in horde, it’s big and changes the way you play.
But I agree we need more maps!!
I hope it will be at least 4 real new minimum in the next update.
Then remastered version of old maps .
I am replaying the campaign lately, Sooooo many possibilities for good maps.
“Pahanu”? What’s that?
Have you mastered all sides of all maps in horde yet. When you do they will release a new map.
yes
When they need my dollars they could release new maps… if they are interested in my dollars of course.
its a map for FAZH , a snipers ground so the speak hahahahaha
You must have missed one side of some map apparently.
We are waiting…
Yes, they should hire 2 more senior level designers to have them make map packs. I think the gears community will pay their salary when they release a pack of levels…
exactly right… I wouldn’t mind into pouring money into MAP PACKS. as long as they are good and fun to play with.
I love the game and i’m willing to support it of course… I agree with you @cribbel
GaaS just allows publishers to push their unfinished, broken product on the market ASAP, with the promises of content and bug fixes coming through roadmaps and future seasons.
But hey, here’s a crazy idea: release your game polished with sufficient enough content to warrant a $60 - $120 straight up purchase. This way people won’t feel ripped off or angry. Plus they’ll actually stick around and if are inclined, will buy future content.
It’s quite sad seeing how accepting people are of GaaS. Like they’ve almost forgotten the days of when you purchased a game, half the content wasn’t cut to be sold later in bundles or weekly stores.
My point exactly… I mean if the game its supposed to be a barebones experience they just give it for free and let people buy the maps , accesories and features if the game its going to be like that .
But its moronic to ask a pricing tag of 60 dlls and then tell me its a GaaS game , its offensive to my intelligence and millions of other more.
As long as they work out who will be able to play them. In horde it’s easy, the owner needs to host. Private or public. Ranked maybe it would be enough if one from each team own the pack. Otherwise there will be DLC lockouts. And people will be divided.
Yup, much rather play some new ones. Maybe throw in river. The content is so overwhelming and we’re dragged on a string of promises every week. It’s ridiculous.
The carmines are welcome tho, good job with dialogue and the extra skins. But I’m about through with playing dress up for any character. Credit where credit is due tho.
yes my friend @Crazyjacknuts that could work or " OVERPASS" those maps would rock…
at this point I would rather have old maps than to play the same ones over and over again… now if they decided to throw a horde map editor that would really rock. !!
the rate of delivering new maps are so slow… that where I really think they just wasting time creating FUNKO POP dolls instead of creating better maps somehow hahahaha 
That’s because people have the attention span of a gnat lol
Bring back Guardian!!!
Guardian would be a great addition . 
That it would!!!
I am still hopeful of its return.
Without it I won’t be playing or using anything they change/create lol
Bring back Guardian!!!
Isn’t the map editor coming to multiplayer and horde eventually? Pretty sure that was the original goal. But like your OP I haven’t heard anything on either.
Yes a sniper map with no sniper.
Awesome, thanks Daniel
we need new maps for all modes asap
I’ve been saying that exact same thing from the start. I remember the days when games launched with ALL their content and THEN the dev team worked on extras. Not nowadays though. Now they literally are releasing when they finish about 60%, fk even looking for the bugs, the beta tes… sorry, the players will find them for the dev team to ignore
I agree and disagree with option 3. The characters that would normally start with Assault Rifles should be allowed to choose any Assault Rifle, except the Lancer GL, i firmly believe that should be a JD weaopn only, Command staff and all that. Characters that use Snipers should be allowed to use any and all Sniper type weapons and Explosive character users be able to choose any and all explosive type weapons. Engineers should be given the worst type of weapons in the game, as they do not need them, their job is to build and repair, and they should stick to that.
And, it is not a weapon as such, but i do believe it is time for the Turret to return, it is much needed. At the moment the game lacks certain things. I do not know about anyone else, but i have found that the first half of the game for the Engineer is building Barriers and Weapons Lockers, Sentries are build lastly, and it is almost like they are not needed in the game anymore, or more to the point, not enough Energy to build as we once did in Gears of War 4 Horde. Using Energy for Perks is and will always be a mistake made by The Coalition, these skills should and need to be earned by experience.
And, whilst i did mention that Sentries seem to be less needed, it does not mean that the Turret is less needed too. It is not just the Engineer that uses the Turret. In Gears of War 4 Horde i would often build a minimum of 2 Turrets, and upgrade them to level 3, rarely to level 4, depending upon the team and Energy. In Gears 5, with the Energy situation as it is, i doubt i would ever get a level 4 Turret (exaggeration).
So, yeah, option 3, i agree and disagree with. Yes, open market on the weapons, but only certain weapon types to certain Classes/Roles/Heroes.